"Nomination" is part of the process of selecting a candidate for either election to an office, or the bestowing of an honor or award. "Presumptive nominee" is a term used when a person or organization believes that the nomination in inevitable. The act of being a candidate in a race is called a "candidacy."
"Candidate" is a derivative of the Latin "candida" (white). In Ancient Rome, people running for political office would usually wear togas chalked and bleached to be bright white at speeches, debates, conventions, and other public functions.
Contents |
Candidates in elections
In the context of elections for public office in a representational partisan democracy, a candidate who has been selected by a political party is normally said to be the nominee of that party. The party's selection (that is, the nomination) is typically accomplished either based on one or more primary elections according to the rules of the party and any applicable election laws.
Candidates are either incumbents, if they are already serving in the office for which they are seeking re-election, challengers, if they are seeking to unseat an incumbent, or are simply candidates for an open seat, an elective office for which no incumbent is seeking re-election.
In the context of elections for public office in a direct democracy, a candidate can be nominated by any eligible person -- and if parliamentary procedures are used, the nomination has to be seconded, i.e., receive agreement from a second person.
In some non-partisan representative systems (e.g., administrative elections of the Bahá'í Faith), no nominations (or campaigning, electioneering, etc.) take place at all, with voters free to choose any person at the time of voting--with some possible exceptions such as through a minimum age requirement--in the jurisdiction. In such cases, it is not required (or even possible) that the members of the electorate be familiar with all of the eligible persons in their area, though such systems may involve indirect elections at larger geographic levels to ensure that some first-hand familiarity among potential electees can exist at these levels (i.e., among the elected delegates).
A person may also be directly nominated for a post without having to be elected.
Presumed advantages of nominations
- Although a nominee need not have sought appointment himself or herself (presumably the existence of a system of nominating others implies that a person desiring the position would not (or could not) necessarily seek out a post themselves), nominations frequently occur in the context of elections with the active awareness of the nominee. An awareness beforehand of the willingness of the would-be candidate to accept the post might be seen as at least a time-saving advantage and an indicator of their confidence in being able to handle the job (if not a minimal indicator in their competence to handle the job).
- Having a narrowed down set of choices would allow people to study the positions, character, etc. of the nominated choices before making their choice.
- In typically two-party systems, the competitive process is seen to promote moderate candidates (as they are believed to be able to have the best chance to capture the vote for their party and have a broader appeal across the voting spectrum).
Presumed disadvantages of nominations
- The nomination process may limit the choices open to the voters at the time of voting.
- The limited number of choices may lead to voter disenfranchisement and lackluster participation.
- Nominations (and the often associated electioneering and campaigning) are seen to more often elect self-aggrandizing, self-seeking, and deal-making individuals, instead of humble, selfless, and conscience-voting/independent-minded persons. As such, some often less assertive or media-shy (yet potentially capable) groups such as women, certain ethnic groups, or skilled technocrats may tend to be overlooked in such a process, especially when the nomination process is allowed to be followed by campaigning.
Presumptive nominee
The presumptive nominee, in the politics of the United States, is the candidate who has not yet received the official nomination of their political party at the party's nominating convention, but who is the undisputed front-runner and is widely, or even unanimously, presumed to be the candidate that party will nominate. The term is applied widely on the national level, notably in regard to the U.S. presidential nominating conventions and the statewide level.
A candidate may be considered a presumptive nominee after all other major competitors have dropped out and it is considered unlikely that the candidate will withdraw, be usurped, or be otherwise removed from the race. Alternatively, in presidential elections, a candidate may be deemed the presumptive nominee after having accumulated enough delegate commitments through the primary elections and caucuses to be assured of the eventual nomination at the convention.
In the U.S. presidential elections, the selection of delegates has been increasingly shifted earlier in the process to produce a presumptive nominee as early as possible, even in the presence of many strong candidates. The rise of Super Tuesday in the 1980s has led to the emergence of a presumptive nominee in both major parties by early March in all recent elections with the exception of 2008, when a spirited contest between Democratic candidates Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama made it impossible for Obama to secure enough delegates and become the presumptive nominee until early June. Al Gore and George W. Bush were the presumptive nominees of their respective parties after Super Tuesday in 2000,[1] and John Kerry was the presumptive nominee for the Democratic Party in 2004.[2]
A sitting President of the United States who is running for re-election will often be the presumptive nominee from the start of the nominating process: recent examples include Ronald Reagan in 1984, Bill Clinton in 1996, and George W. Bush in 2004. However, a strong challenger or weak president can negate that status: examples in recent history include President Gerald Ford, who faced a challenge from Reagan in 1976 and President Jimmy Carter, challenged by Ted Kennedy in 1980.
John McCain[3] was the nominee for the Republican party in the 2008 United States presidential election. McCain was formally nominated at the Republican National Convention but lost to Barack Obama, who was the nominee for the Democratic party in the 2008 United States presidential election. He formally became the nominee when Hillary Clinton conceded at the Democratic National Convention on August 27, 2008.[4]
See also
| Look up candidate in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
| Look up nominate in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
- Paper candidate
- Parachute candidate
- Perennial candidate
- Sleeper candidate
- Résumé candidate
- Write-in candidate
References
- ^ Raasch, Chuck. November contest looks like Gore vs. Bush. Gannett News Service. USA Today. 2000-03-07.
- ^ Kerry strikes back at Bush on ads. CNN. 2004-05-05.
- ^ CNN.com, McCain wins GOP nomination; Huckabee bows out
- ^ [1]
| This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be and removed. (April 2007) |
Categories: Elections
|
Philadelphia Inquirer
Independent candidate for governor Chris Daggett announced yesterday that he has raised enough money to qualify for matching state funds, ...
Candidates tout energy plans in governor's race Examiner.com
GOV. candidates focus on green energy WMGM
Independent NJ candidate qualifies for match Philadelphia Inquirer
all 95 news articles »
541px x 480px | 47.90kB
[source page]
2004 Green Party Candidates l to r Tom Taylor Becki Smith David Cobb Jay Pond Van Presley behind Cobb
Thomas Wheatley
Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:22:15 GM
Atlanta Creative Loafing Weekly Newspaper, shelter from the mainstream for news, event listings, dining, movies and music.
Q. Candidates spend millions on these private pollsters and then make important campaign decisions based on their results. The majority of voters think these polls are incorrect. Are the candidates stupid for putting so much faith in the polls?
Asked by Dr Jones - Thu Oct 2 12:05:25 2008 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It's only "flawed" when the candidate you are supporting is trailing. When your candidate is leading, we never hear you, it works for both sides.
Answered by Captain Cod - Thu Oct 2 12:10:27 2008
